One of the things I love about the PhotoActive podcast I co-host with Kirk McElhearn is our different approaches to photography. Yes, there’s a lot of overlap, but (to generalize) Kirk brings much more of a history of photography as an art form, while I have more practical shooting and editing experience. I think it’s a great combination, particularly for an episode such as the latest one where we talk about evaluating photos. Is a “great” photo great because of the time period it was taken? Because it’s appeared in museums? Because someone influential said so?
I really enjoyed this conversation: Episode 163: Photo Criticism.
Give it a listen at PhotoActive.co or in your favorite podcast player. And if you haven’t yet done so, please rate and review PhotoActive in Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you subscribe to podcasts.
Jeff Carlson | Never Enough Coffee Creations 